{"id":989,"date":"2015-10-11T20:43:00","date_gmt":"2015-10-11T20:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/projects\/horsesforsources\/cannibalize-or-extinct_101115\/"},"modified":"2015-10-11T20:43:00","modified_gmt":"2015-10-11T20:43:00","slug":"cannibalize-or-extinct_101115","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/cannibalize-or-extinct_101115\/","title":{"rendered":"Cannibalize or face extinction (if you want to survive in the As-a-Service Economy)"},"content":{"rendered":"
This pretty much sums up where we are as a global services industry. We’re embarking on the next phase of productivity, and that means we have to incorporate it into our contracts and prepare to invest in the future model,<\/em> not merely perpetuate the old one.<\/p>\n Service Providers invested in the old FTE model and it worked, now they need to\u00a0make new investments in As-a-Service delivery<\/span><\/p>\n It’s not completely dissimilar to the old “lift and shift” FTE-centric deals of 5+ years ago, where providers would invest in\u00a0the short term costs of\u00a0client transitions, and spread the investments out over a 5-7 year contract to make the deal offer immediate attractive cost-saving gains for clients. \u00a0Yes, they were making their first steps to becoming insurance firms<\/em> for their clients, which is even more the case today, where the risks are higher and the savings more challenging to generate. \u00a0However, if today’s service providers fail to develop scalable As-a-Service delivery platforms they can replicate across clients for the future, they will likely get replaced by other service providers in the future, which have made the investments necessary to provide\u00a0more automated delivery, better data – and consequently more intelligent operating talent.<\/p>\n OK – the legacy FTE deals were less risky, so long as you could deliver up the lower cost people and shift the work to them without any major blow-ups. \u00a0The modern deals require providers to find additional margin by automating processes effectively, converting\u00a0freed-up effort into lower operating costs and also redeploying available talent on higher value collaborative activities. \u00a0In other words, the old model was all about hard savings<\/em> from direct labor swapping, the As-a-Service model is about a combination of smarter labor provision and genuine process transformation through better technology (i.e. soft<\/em> savings).<\/p>\n It’s higher risk to avoid<\/em> making the necessary investments – extinction could beckon for many<\/span><\/p>\n As the following graphic\u00a0clearly illustrates, from our recent As-a-Service study<\/a>\u00a0covering 178 major buyers of services, if the major decision makers (SVPs and above) fail to see real As-a-Service progress made by their existing service providers, six-out-of-ten believe replacing<\/em>\u00a0their services providers would have a\u00a0significant impact<\/em>\u00a0smoothing their progress towards their desired As-a-Service end-state<\/a>.<\/p>\n While their more junior subordinates clearly do not view replacing their service providers as having such a drastic impact (25%), the frustration at the senior levels from providers’ failed promises and lack of progress to invest beyond the legacy model is abundantly clear:<\/p>\n<\/a>\u201cTen years ago, my CEO asked me to drive efficiencies through offshore outsourcing, now he\u2019s asking me to make them through automation\u201d, declared the CFO of a major corporation at the recent NASSCOM event in India.<\/em><\/p>\n