{"id":851,"date":"2016-06-24T04:15:00","date_gmt":"2016-06-24T04:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/projects\/horsesforsources\/digital-labor-1-4-million-jobs_062416\/"},"modified":"2016-06-24T04:15:00","modified_gmt":"2016-06-24T04:15:00","slug":"digital-labor-1-4-million-jobs_062416","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/digital-labor-1-4-million-jobs_062416\/","title":{"rendered":"Digital labor will trim 1.4 million global services jobs by 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"
It\u2019s time we dispelled the scaremongering and hype and gave you the true picture of how advances in automation tools and methodologies, such as RPA and autonomics, will impact the global IT services and BPO industry over the next five years.<\/p>\n
The current debate on these issues is as polarizing as it is confusing. On the consumer-facing side of technology, we have a fervent and far-reaching debate about the ethics of artificial intelligence and automation, led by executives from the likes of Google and Facebook. On the enterprise side, we frequently see quotes from studies from firms such as McKinsey and Gartner<\/a> predicting seismic job losses through the impact of disruptive technologies that could have a devastating impact on the global economy and society in the next few years.<\/p>\n Yet, many of the leading stakeholders much closer to the true deployment of emerging enterprise Intelligent Automation tools and platforms\u2014namely the service providers, the ISVs and the sourcing advisors\u2014remain on the sidelines when it comes to discussing the true impact<\/em> of automation as it\u2019s adopted by many enterprises today.<\/p>\n We\u2019ve been talking, for the best part of two decades, about how to \u201ctransform\u201d business and IT processes after the cost benefits of labor arbitrage have been maximized. Well, the simple fact is that much of these arbitrage costs are close to optimization for mature services providers that have well-honed global delivery machines. As enterprise clients demand further cost advantages, and as competitors become increasingly aggressive with their service pricing, the focus shifts toward clients attaining outcomes that are not always directly linked to lower headcount rates.<\/p>\n \u201cIntelligent Automation-as-a-Service\u201d is a genuine lever for enterprises to pull for further productivity gains beyond low-cost offshore labor <\/span><\/p>\n Consequently, many enterprises that have chosen to externalize their service delivery can enjoy even more cost effective services, as ambitious service providers further rationalize their delivery organizations by taking advantage of automation to standardize and scale service delivery to their clients.\u00a0 In short, while many enterprises can invest directly in Intelligent Automation into their own processes, they can also simply outsource those processes to service providers, which can embed further productivity gains tied to automation, in addition to labor arbitrage.\u00a0 \u201cIntelligent Automation-as-a-Service\u201d is quickly emerging as a significant productivity option for enterprises as part of their service delivery.<\/p>\n Sadly, greater productivity and effectiveness through \u201cdigital labor\u201d comes at a societal cost\u2014jobs that were once required are no longer needed. However, we would point out that the jobs that are being phased out are no longer being recreated in any case, and much of this shrinkage will likely come from natural attrition as some people leave the service industry for more relevant jobs in other industries.<\/p>\n The Impact of Automation on Services Jobs<\/span><\/p>\n The following graphic\u00a0shows three Automation Impact Scenarios<\/em> for the IT and BPO services industry, ranging from a modest\/conservative prediction which is a continuation of current RPA use to a scenario we consider more likely where adoption of RPA and more Intelligent Automation increases to an aggressive scenario, where automation adoption hits a broader range of the skills. If we examine the most likely outcome, Scenario 2, we see strong growth for highly and medium skilled personnel\u2014with highly skilled positions in our industry increasing by 56%, and medium-skilled by 8%. However, low skilled, routine jobs drop 30% as many of these roles get phased out over the next 5 years, resulting in a net loss of 9% of jobs, totaling 1.4 million:<\/p>\n Click to Enlarge<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The following graphics shows Scenario 2, the Likely Scenario<\/em>, in more detail, outlining the number of workers being affected within each skill category over the next 5 years:<\/p>\n Click to Enlarge<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n