{"id":6098,"date":"2025-04-13T16:17:27","date_gmt":"2025-04-13T16:17:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/?p=6098"},"modified":"2025-04-13T16:17:27","modified_gmt":"2025-04-13T16:17:27","slug":"doge-trillions-savings_041325","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/doge-trillions-savings_041325\/","title":{"rendered":"DOGE would find trillions in savings and value if it zeroes in on US healthcare"},"content":{"rendered":"

While the US administration obsesses with pointing DOGE at relatively small levels of governmental expenditure in areas such as USAID and the Department of Education, when it comes to US healthcare, there are levels of cost inefficiencies and improved outcomes that could reach trillions of dollars if managed effectively.<\/p>\n

In fact, if US healthcare were its own country, its annual spending of $5.2 trillion would make it the world\u2019s third-largest country by GDP. Yet, the US has amongst the worst health outcomes among OECD countries, with the lowest life expectancies for both men and women, and has not been able to address obesity and mental health epidemics:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Click to Enlarge<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

At the same time, the prevalence of chronic conditions rises without checks. So, in some ways, DOGE hacking away at what it considers wasteful spending of taxpayer\u2019s money is welcome. In that context, we provide DOGE recommendations on where such cuts should be in healthcare.<\/p>\n

These three main categories drive the cost of healthcare in the US:<\/p>\n