{"id":6057,"date":"2025-03-04T01:11:19","date_gmt":"2025-03-04T01:11:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/?p=6057"},"modified":"2025-03-04T01:52:07","modified_gmt":"2025-03-04T01:52:07","slug":"services-back-to-us_030325","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/services-back-to-us_030325\/","title":{"rendered":"AI, tariffs and de-globalization could drive services creation in the US"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
There has never been a time during the last three decades that the world has seemed less flat…<\/p>\n
Thirty years of the Internet and the rapid development of ubiquitous data, coupled with the emergence of developing nations hungry to support bloated greedy corporations, had led us to a place where employment has seamlessly moved to low-cost locations to support these corporations at much lower cost and scale than employing people locally.<\/p>\n
Until recently, these corporations primarily favored contracting with third-party outsourcers to deliver this lower-cost work, but we have seen a marked swing toward many of them opting to hire offshore people directly into their own labor forces as part of what they are marketing as \u201cGlobal Capability Centers<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n However which way we look at this, the basic premise has been the same: moving work to low-cost locations that can rapidly scale up to deliver that work. Whether it is more beneficial to employ people directly in low-cost locations or contract to have them deliver work through third parties isn\u2019t really that important.\u00a0 The big question now is whether these corporations are going to have tariffs imposed for exporting<\/em> corporate operations outside of the country that could be managed at home<\/em>.<\/p>\n In the past, when economies got tight, and corporates panicked, there was always the constant of sending more IT and process work to India, more manufacturing to China, or more customer support to the Philippines to keep operating costs down and CFOs at bay.\u00a0 However, there is now increasing concern from industry leaders that all their exports of work outside the US will come under the spotlight as the tariff programs get rolled out. The impact would ultimately result in big hikes in costs, which could be as high as the 25% level, considering the current tariffs that are being set. Why stop at Mexico, Canada, China, and the EU?<\/p>\n In our view at HFS, this will further drive the focus on AI-first services<\/em> where increasing amounts of service provision are programmed into software platforms using agentic technology, generative AI, and other AI technologies. <\/span>As we discussed recently, six out of ten enterprises are already serious about adopting an AI-fist approach to professional services<\/a>, so doesn\u2019t this throw the whole location question out the window as the line between services and software increasingly blurs?\u00a0 If we are going to be buying supercharged agentic humans before long, so will the focus from people scale to outcomes:<\/p>\n We have already projected Services-as-Software presents a $1.5 trillion opportunity<\/a> for both software and services firms, where enterprises stop buying static technology and people-intensive services and instead consume AI-powered, outcome-driven solutions that continuously evolve and adapt to changing business requirements.\u00a0 What we hadn’t projected were the locations<\/em> that would benefit from this expenditure.<\/p>\nSuddenly, we find ourselves in a world where moving work around the world carries a lot more risk… and cost<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
<\/p>\n
Why the US services option is becoming increasingly attractive\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n