{"id":4717,"date":"2009-05-03T17:08:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-03T17:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/projects\/horsesforsources\/phil-fersht-on-service-provider-rankings-make-the-experts-accountable-not-faceless-brands\/"},"modified":"2009-05-03T17:08:00","modified_gmt":"2009-05-03T17:08:00","slug":"phil-fersht-on-service-provider-rankings-make-the-experts-accountable-not-faceless-brands","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/phil-fersht-on-service-provider-rankings-make-the-experts-accountable-not-faceless-brands\/","title":{"rendered":"Phil Fersht on service provider rankings: make the experts accountable, not faceless brands"},"content":{"rendered":"

Vinnie Mirchandani has his <\/em>latest take<\/em><\/a> on the constant controversy of third-party researchers, consultants and associations compiling rankings of service providers.  This time the <\/em>IAOP's Global Services 100<\/em><\/a> is being questioned.<\/em>  <\/p>\n

We've also had some banter about the Black Book of Outsourcing<\/a> on this site, which made such a noise with its constant rankings of service providers, that Datamonitor decided to buy them<\/a> to hop on this bandwagon.  And we've never even got to discussing the Global Services 100<\/a>, or sever<\/span>al other rankings that come out periodically.  \"BenMoreover, some "analyst" firms make a living ranking service providers, while barely bothering to talk to their customers, and selling white papers to the winners so they can flout their success (you all know who you are).<\/p>\n

Personally, as an analyst and advisor, I find these lists useful – I sometimes find out about some provider I didn't know a lot about, and they draw attention to who's doing well at the\n<\/p>\n


\nmoment.  But that's all I care about. If these entities produced a directory of service providers, it would be a valuable resource to the industry at large.  But that isn't really the case; why produce free information of you can't sell it as marketing collateral?<\/p>\n

What worries me is the following:<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n