{"id":3771,"date":"2016-11-21T14:24:00","date_gmt":"2016-11-21T14:24:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/projects\/horsesforsources\/is-automation-the-next-trumpism\/"},"modified":"2016-11-21T14:24:00","modified_gmt":"2016-11-21T14:24:00","slug":"is-automation-the-next-trumpism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/is-automation-the-next-trumpism\/","title":{"rendered":"Is automation the next Trumpism?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
Even a few days after the US elections, I am still shocked.<\/p>\n
Most people in the world are shocked, apart from outliers such as Vladimir Putin. It is difficult to brush off the xenophobic tirades, sexism, protectionism, misogynist outbursts, etc., etc., as sheer rhetoric or just a means to an end. Yet, we really don\u2019t know what is coming. Can one individual really change the US political system and break the influence of the vested interests? And more poignantly, can we believe any politician, let alone Donald Trump, on the many promises made on election campaigns (and beyond)? Even more pertinently, the notion that Trump will stand up for the long-suffering (white, male) working class just seems incredulous.<\/p>\n
While it is utterly tempting to let my emotions get the better of me and just let rip, from a narrow sourcing point of view, two issues stand out: Immigration and, intrinsically linked to that, whether automation could fill the void if global sourcing is being disrupted by immigration policies.<\/p>\n
The following is not meant to be a comprehensive analysis. Rather, as it is a blog, it is meant to stimulate debate. At the same time, dissecting populism is always contingent to context. As we have seen with Brexit in the UK, and as we are likely to see in the US, political decision-making is not based on a set of consistent policies or even on policies aimed at the majority who voted for Brexit and Trump. In my humble opinion, populism is all about being self-serving to the whims of politicians. However, as these politicians increasingly make it to the highest offices, we have to start thinking about scenario planning. Put another way, there is little value in discussing potential policies in an abstract way.<\/p>\n
The immigration debate is complex and thorny<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The threat of curbing immigration in the US is nothing new and tends to reach boiling point whenever elections are close. Yet, as Phil<\/a> has pointed out, Trump’s campaign has already outwardly promoted raising the H1B minimum salary to $100,000 per year (from $60K). This makes managing complex IT projects a lot more expensive and negates much of the cost advantage for complex engagement requiring “landed” IT staff.<\/p>\n However, how much of this is sheer ideology and how much will be actually pursued in the political process? Will we really see Muslims being banned from entering the US and Mexico really paying for a wall at its border?<\/p>\n Invariably, there are many parallels to the unfolding of Brexit in the UK. For politicians (not necessarily voters), the topic of immigration is largely ideology. Thus, for immigrants the change cannot solely be measured by legislation being forthcoming. It is as much about a change in mindset, the depiction of the media and changes in everyday life as it is about deconstructing possible legislation. In the UK at least, the political culture and more alarmingly the attitude towards immigrants, has changed. In particular, immigrants from Eastern Europe are\u00a0being bullied at school and violence against immigrants is sharply on the rise.<\/p>\n In terms of legislation in the UK, the battleground in the negotiations with the European Union will be about the access of the European Single Market.<\/p>\n For the European Union, this is intertwined with Freedom of Movement, yet only the negotiations will show where the red lines really are. Conversely, for the UK,\u00a0Brexit proponents immigration and access to the Single Market appear to be separate issues. The point here is not to delve into specifics on the political details but to call out that the rhetoric and the promises made by those politicians. Moving the perspective back to the US, it appears to be implausible to expect Trump\u2019s own empire to be able to run without immigrants \u2013 legal and illegal alike. Rather, expect the reality of political decision-making on Capitol Hill to sink in over time \u2013 yet with the big caveat\u00a0that you can\u2019t discount The Donald.<\/p>\n Beware of the automation pipedream<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n