{"id":2027,"date":"2016-07-16T16:42:00","date_gmt":"2016-07-16T16:42:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/projects\/horsesforsources\/oneoffice-dumboffice_071716\/"},"modified":"2016-07-16T16:42:00","modified_gmt":"2016-07-16T16:42:00","slug":"oneoffice-dumboffice_071716","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/oneoffice-dumboffice_071716\/","title":{"rendered":"OneOffice or DumbOffice? Service providers are bifurcating again"},"content":{"rendered":"
In the old days of labor arbitrage centric outsourcing (which of course doesn’t happen anymore) we had two quite clearly defined sets of service provider –<\/p>\n
Then the likes of Accenture, IBM and Capgemini realized the offshore firms had eaten their lunch and they rolled out their own offshore delivery functions in 2005-2010 to circumvent the heavy flow of dollars to the Indian-centric majors. Accenture and IBM managed to catch up and compete on price when they needed to, while Capgemini really needed to acquire IGATE last year to be more effective as an offshore provider, in addition to being an integrator. Meanwhile, you had the likes of Deloitte, PwC and E&Y, which chose to stay out of the offshore game and sell integration capabilities as consultants, rather than managed service outsourcers. The losers in all of this were the traditional IT\/BPO services providers, such as HP(EDS), CSC, Xerox(ACS) et al whose lunch was eaten by the offshore providers, struggling to compete on price, scale and flexibility.<\/p>\n
Then along comes Digital and Automation as the new value drivers and suddenly the game is changing again<\/em> – labor arbitrage is still a key cost lever, but it needs to be balanced with automation to drive down the cost and increase the productivity even further, while the broader goals of the ambitious C-Suites are to create real digital capabilities to create<\/em> their markets, not play constant catch up to avoid being disrupted.:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n So what are these two emerging groups of service provider?<\/span><\/p>\n OneOffice Enablers<\/strong> – focused on designing and enabling the digital customer experience and tying the front to the back to make it all happen (see below). This is where I also see the bigger plays around cognitive happening. Lots more project-based deals for the Deloittes, Accentures, IBMs, KPMGs and emerging players, like Cognizant, which are moving up the value chain and developing deep specialization is various areas of the OneOffice environment (see below). We’ll also see several small consultants emerge in this space with industry specialization. <\/p>\n Back Office Outsourcers <\/strong>– focused on efficiency, automation, arbitrate and scalability. This is where the many of the current crop of offshore-centric and legacy outsourcers will likely end up if they fail to make the right investments… they will push hard to be in the “OneOffice” category, make a lot of the right noises, but the lion’s share of their business will be in this group. <\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n Click to enlarge<\/a><\/p>\n What’s driving this is a marked sense of urgency we are seeing from enterprise leadership we haven’t seen before, where 56% of SVPs and above, in our new Intelligent Operations study, now expect to have intelligent operations in just two years (this number was 30% when we ran a similar study 18 months’ ago):<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n