{"id":1741,"date":"2010-02-11T07:49:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-11T07:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/projects\/horsesforsources\/will-the-bskyb-verdict-tone-down-outsourcing-vendor-hype\/"},"modified":"2010-02-11T07:49:00","modified_gmt":"2010-02-11T07:49:00","slug":"will-the-bskyb-verdict-tone-down-outsourcing-vendor-hype","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/will-the-bskyb-verdict-tone-down-outsourcing-vendor-hype\/","title":{"rendered":"Will the BSkyB verdict tone-down outsourcing vendor hype?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Trust the Brits to tone-down the hype of the outsourcing sales pitch, with BSkyB broadcasting organization <\/span><\/strong>being awarded $313m in damages<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/a> for a $75m EDS (now part of HP) CRM implementation with didn't quite pass muster. So is this a major warning shot for vendors over-hyping their capabilities to win deals, or is EDS simply falling foul of failing to satisfy Rupert Murdoch?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n While several people are calling this verdict a one-off, I take the view that this sets a dangerous precedent for the outsourcing business, when you consider the sheer volume of complex outsourcing deals<\/a> that are currently (and soon to be) in play. <\/p>\n Another one of these verdicts (especially if it's State-side) and we really could see a damaging domino-effect of lawsuits that could change the whole way deals are priced, negotiated and delivered. I even met with a consulting firm the other day, which is making a killing "rescuing" contracts, but in reality is mediating between vendor and customer to annul the broken marriage. <\/p>\n My fear is that the outsourcing industry is currently operating in a pressure-cooker situation for the following reasons: <\/p>\n
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n\n