What is your basis of competition?\u00a0\u00a0 Or what can you safely outsource?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\nThis seems like an easy question, but many people don\u2019t seem to know what it is, or accept that it may be changing. \u00a0Quite simply, your basis of competition is that reason why your customer chooses you over your competitor. It can be color, feature, function, style, availability or a host of other things. It is crucial that you know your basis of competition and then concentrate the resources of your enterprise into being the best in the world at whatever that is.<\/p>\n
Using the automotive industry as an example, the car\u2019s, features, function, and appearance were initially the most significant characteristics in the buying decision of most consumers.\u00a0 However, in the recent past the dealership experience and service after the purchase have become more important to a significant portion of the market.\u00a0 The American auto companies appear to have missed this shift.\u00a0 The big three still devote most of their capital and management talent to developing new products, when they should be concentrating a significant portion of those resources into making the dealership experience more \u201cuser friendly\u201d; just as their competition has.<\/p>\n
\u00a0This \u201cbasis of competition\u201d becomes the basis for making outsourcing decisions. This has often been confused with the idea of \u201ccore\u201d and \u201cnon-core\u201d.\u00a0 I think these designations are confusing. \u00a0Core invokes images of support pillars and foundations and weight bearing beams, while outsourcing seems to imply that you don\u2019t believe these things are important.\u00a0 Clearly this isn\u2019t correct. \u00a0They are important, they have to be done well, and they must be performed in a timely and transparent way to the organization. However, if a function isn\u2019t your basis of competition, you still need to have it done the in the most effective and efficient manner that you can.\u00a0 Whether or not you do it in house or hire someone to do it for you doesn\u2019t matter, as long as it is the most effective way of getting it done.<\/p>\n
The beginning of any outsourcing project is a strategic plan for your business. You need to understand what markets you are going to be in both functionally and geographically.\u00a0 You also need to understand how you are going to win in those markets.\u00a0 Why is your offering going to be the most appealing?\u00a0 This may be as simple as no one else is in that particular market or it may be something distinctive about your product or service. \u00a0Whatever it is, the distinction won\u2019t last long and pretty soon someone will show up offering something similar, so you must plan the changes you will build into the offering going forward in time.<\/p>\n
The forward looking plan will require capital, management attention, and an understanding that you will have to adjust when something unexpected happens.\u00a0 Given that you are in this rapidly changing game, you need to look at those functions that you are currently doing that take time, capital, other resources and determine if you can find a way to do those things with less. This is where outsourcing comes in.<\/p>\n
Outsourcing isn\u2019t new. It has been going on since the industrial revolution. The simplest example is electricity. \u00a0The Ford River Rouge Complex built by Henry Ford to be a model of modern efficiency, generated its own power and fed it to every part of the complex, including Henry\u2019s house.\u00a0 As local utilities developed, every company in America found it easier and cheaper to buy that power from the utility and not have its own power generating capability, other than for short term emergency situations. No one today would think of building their own power generating capability.<\/p>\n
In the mid 1960\u2019s, as computers were becoming a ubiquitous business tool, many upper and mid level managers were struggling to understand how to use these tools. Everyone wanted one or more of these tools; the expense was a new line item they didn\u2019t understand and the budget requests were growing exponentially year over year.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Into this environment, companies like EDS began to offer what would today be called BPO services. They made the capital investments and more importantly had the technical management talent to not only manage information technology resources, but to take advantage of the capabilities that were offered. The interesting innovation here was beginning to sell services, rather than software. Initially, this was attractive to banks and insurance companies where the outsourcer processed claims or kept bank records.<\/p>\n
As these companies expanded, they simply did not have the expertise to find more and more innovations to the processes of the industries they were try to penetrate. Eventually they began selling operating the computer infrastructure as a service, as well as larger and larger contract programming projects. This made the Information Technology environment a utility. Soon there were standard resource units and comparison shopping was facilitated.<\/p>\n
In this IT example, the outsourcer provided value by having a best in class process (or set of processes) to deliver IT infrastructure globally. The outsourcer leveraged economies of scale to spread assets and scarce technical expertise across multiple clients. The underlying process was important to the business, but wasn\u2019t a competitive differentiator. Quite simply, the computers need to run well, but no one ever bought an outsourcer\u2019s client\u2019s product or service because their files were backed up or the clerk\u2019s terminals had a good response time. \u00a0If the company didn\u2019t have a good computer infrastructure the company would not function well, but the competitive differentiator is why people buy the output.<\/p>\n
Once you have determined what you are going to compete on, then you need to develop a plan to be the very best in the world at delivering that competitive basis. There are many things that you\u2019ll need to do to deliver, but only a few will be absolutely key. How you achieve that basis is something that you most likely will want to keep as secret as possible. You\u2019ll clearly want to do that with your own employees and, preferably, ones that have a significant stake in the prosperity of the company.\u00a0 Everything else you need to do is important, necessary, and vital, but isn\u2019t something that gives you a competitive edge. It isn\u2019t core.<\/p>\n
So, if there is a provider that can do those things for you at the necessary quality levels, then you need to evaluate if they are also less expensively, will \u00a0allow you to avoid using your capital, and will give you more hours in the week to focus on\u00a0 delivering, and improving your competitive differentiation.\u00a0 If they can, then outsourcing is the best way for you to proceed and enhance your competitive basis. \u00a0<\/p>\n
Mike Atwood<\/em><\/a>\u00a0(pictured above), is Expert Contrubutor for IT Outsourcing strategies for HfS Research Ltd.\u00a0 You can access his full bio <\/em>here<\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Mike Atwood, Expert Contributor for IT Outsourcing, Horses for Sources There was some great discussion recently\u00a0on why outsourcing in competitive…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,81,832],"tags":[551],"organization":[],"ppma_author":[19],"class_list":["post-1693","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business-process-outsourcing-bpo","category-it-outsourcing-it-services","category-sourcing-best-practises","tag-mike-atwood"],"yoast_head":"\n
What is your basis of competition? Or what can you safely outsource? - Horses for Sources | No Boundaries<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n