, has a simplistic view of what needs to transpire for customers to actually receive regular delights… over to you Mike:<\/span><\/p>\nWhy aren\u2019t I happy with my outsourcer?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\nHow many times have you heard someone say that all our service metrics are green, but the relationship is red?\u00a0 This sort of non-specific concern about an outsourcer seems to be as old as outsourcing itself. It has certainly existed as long as I\u2019ve been in the field. I recently attended an analyst conference for a major outsourcer andran into an old friend who I\u2019d worked with at EDS andwe got around to discussing a mutual client. This client wasn\u2019t to the point of saying the relationship was red, but he clearly didn\u2019t believe he was getting the value he expected out of his outsourcing relationship.<\/p>\n
In this case, the issue wasn\u2019t that the wrong metrics had been chosen, or that some weasel words in the definitions had caused them to be upset. The problem was in the clients expectations. Those expectations are something that I think fits well into the frame work of the KANO model. (If you aren\u2019t familiar Google it and you will be) . The model says that expectations come in 3 types; \u00a0<\/p>\n
\nThe first are \u201cbasic\u201d elements, which are things that you just assume everyone knows and you don\u2019t write down.<\/li>\n The second requirements are the \u201cmetrics\u201d that outsourcers, consultants, lawyers, andproject teams spend forever trying to nail down.\u00a0<\/li>\n Lastly, \u201cdelights\u201d are those things that you can imagine, but when they happen you are actually excited.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nI believe all outsourcers spend most of their time andenergy working on making the commitments around requirements (2nd<\/sup>type) that they signed up to in the contract. The smart outsourcers have figured out that the basics are real requirements, and long ago stopped asking \u201cWhere does it say that in the contract?\u201d But I know of no firm that takes an organized, deliberate approach to developing delights. There are some individual relationship managers who do, but that\u2019s about it.<\/p>\nThis seems to me to get to the heart of the issue about \u201cwhy aren\u2019t outsourcers proactive?\u201d There are also issues of sunk costs and unrealized depreciation, as well as operational risk, but beyond them all is this desire to have some creative thinking and changes beyond what I\u2019m getting today. By the way, the deeper you get into an outsourcing contract the better the good old days will be remembered!<\/p>\n
So what is an outsourcer to do? I\u2019d suggest that every account team needs to set itself a goal of at least proposing, but better yet, implementing one delight on some periodic basis. The team out to have regular brainstorming meetings and the implementation of delights ought to be managed. To many of us this seems let basic account management, client partnering, but somewhere it has gotten lost andcustomers are sitting around wondering why they hired their outsourcer, even if things are all green!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
It's all about those regular delights… We’ve had a lot of dialog (read here)\u00a0about why\u00a0most\u00a0clients aren’t getting much more than…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,81,832],"tags":[551],"organization":[],"ppma_author":[19],"class_list":["post-1664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business-process-outsourcing-bpo","category-it-outsourcing-it-services","category-sourcing-best-practises","tag-mike-atwood"],"yoast_head":"\n
Why aren\u2019t I happy with my outsourcer? - Horses for Sources | No Boundaries<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n