{"id":1652,"date":"2010-07-08T19:31:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-08T19:31:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/projects\/horsesforsources\/vertical-silos-070810\/"},"modified":"2010-07-08T19:31:00","modified_gmt":"2010-07-08T19:31:00","slug":"vertical-silos-070810","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/vertical-silos-070810\/","title":{"rendered":"Service providers siloed by vertical industry are stifling innovation with clients"},"content":{"rendered":"
When we recently spoke with close to 600 shared services and outsourcing executives across both the buy and sell side of BPO, the tough news for much of the industry is that most\u00a0enterprises are unwilling to collaborate with other firms in their industry to foster innovation with their outsourced business processes.<\/strong>\u00a0<\/p>\n Our new research<\/a> reveals clients\u2019 desire to collaborate with non-competitive firms in other industries is much more powerful.\u00a0 Simply-put, new service delivery models must emerge between collaborating partners that will help them innovate, share their ideas and experiences.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0For example, over half of enterprise buyers are not prepared to collaborate with industry competitors:<\/p>\n I hear you gasp with shock and horror at this revelation.\u00a0 But why, then,\u00a0do so many service providers still persist in stove-piping their business into vertical groupings, when their clients don’t want to talk to each other about their business processes?\u00a0 While it’s clear that\u00a0clients like to be “sold to” by executives who clearly understand their business issues, once the engagement is “live”, the vast majority of governance and process management issues are generic across all firms who outsource.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n To win more business, outsourcing service providers must innovate by creating and unleashing a multi-client collaborative model that isn\u2019t restricting their clients to their industry vertical silos.\u00a0 Our distinguished analyst (I love that title, but he is<\/em> very distinguished…) for shared services and outsourcing governance, Lee Coulter, investigates further.\u00a0 You can also read on this issue indepth in Lee’s new report, available as a freemium pick on our research page<\/a> for a limited time.<\/p>\n Innovation? With THEM?!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n I am almost afraid to write yet another article lamenting the lack of innovation in the BPO industry, but this time, I have some thoughts on how to change the game and I am spreading the blame around a little more evenly. There is plenty of blame to spread around on this one. It\u2019s not entirely your BPO provider\u2019s fault. Innovation is a delicate thing. It is really hard to coax into life, and remarkably easy to kill. That means it takes everyone doing the right things to create it, and anyone doing the wrong thing can stop it.<\/p>\n I am constantly asked about innovation in shared services and BPO from enterprise clients. I have a special place in my heart for innovation because in today\u2019s world, innovation often isn\u2019t about getting ahead; it\u2019s a case of running to stand still. Business consultant James Morse said it best, \u201cThe only sustainable competitive advantage comes from out-innovating the competition\u201d.<\/p>\n In the world of BPO, I tell folks innovation is absolutely possible. It just takes four things:<\/p>\n Sounds pretty easy, but there are a few nuances. First is, that both client and provider need to organize for innovation. Most people don\u2019t have a clear idea of what that really means. It is the most foundational part of the equation, and the one that is often overlooked. I\u2019ll come back to this in a moment.<\/p>\n Contracting for innovation is not actually that difficult. It does mean however that both parties should be expecting to describe it in words, fund it with real money, and resource it with the right people. There is some weird amnesia that afflicts clients the moment they contract for BPO services. They forget that when they ran their own shop that they had specific people and budgets committed to projects and innovation. Somehow once a BPO provider is involved, there is supposed to be some miraculous automatic innovation machine that churns out valuable innovation without any effort or cost.<\/p>\n Funding it is pretty straightforward, however it means everyone needs to clearly identify the funding for it and be clear about what benefits it should generate, and most importantly, don\u2019t strip it out of the deal during price negotiations. It should be a separate part of the contract and pricing so that it doesn\u2019t muddy the waters when evaluating the cost of service delivery.<\/p>\n Governing it isn\u2019t that hard as long as everyone realizes that the people that are dealing with crisis-of-the-day are not the right people to be managing innovation. Different people and different outcomes mean it should be governed separately.<\/p>\n So really it comes down to organizing for it and this is where there is a fundamental breakdown, as our new research data emphasizes. By and large, BPO providers are organized around industry verticals. What is an industry vertical? Simply put, companies that aim to solve the same or similar problems in the marketplace. These companies are typically competitive, due to the overlapping focuses of the products and services that are provided to their customers.<\/p>\n Hmmm, let\u2019s put six or eight or ten competitors in a group together, and then tell each of them that because they are all customers of the same provider, that they will enjoy rich benefits of innovation. I am not sure that strategy was thought all the way through.<\/p>\n Not gonna happen; for a whole lot of reasons. Most notably because each of the clients in an industry vertical group would really like to find a way to smash their competitors in the marketplace! About the last thing they are really excited to do is go share their best practices with a competitor!<\/p>\n There is a better way\u2026 introducing a new model I call the Ecosystem of Collaborating Industries and Processes (ECIP) is based on organizing clients in non-competitive groups that share similar business practices along with clients that are affiliated by process. By combining clients that operate businesses with similar processes in non-competitive spaces, the model accelerates the leverage of assets and creates new channels of cross collaboration while preserving, and in fact enhancing, the provider\u2019s credibility in a given industry space.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Lee Coulter is Research Fellow, HfS Research<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Lee Coulter’s new report, entitled Service Providers siloed by Vertical Industry are Stifling Innovation with Clients <\/em>is available, for a limited time as a freemium report over at our published research page.\u00a0 Go check it out<\/a>…<\/p>\n Lee Coulter (pictured here) is Research Fellow and Distinguished Analyst for HfS Research, having previously led global shared services for Kraft.\u00a0 Prior to that, he had senior roles\u00a0with General Electric and AON\u00a0– you can read his full\u00a0bio <\/em>here<\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" When we recently spoke with close to 600 shared services and outsourcing executives across both the buy and sell side…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,832],"tags":[497],"organization":[],"ppma_author":[19],"class_list":["post-1652","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business-process-outsourcing-bpo","category-sourcing-best-practises","tag-lee-coulter"],"yoast_head":"\n<\/p>\n
\n
<\/a><\/p>\n