HfS Research\/ACCA study<\/a>,\u00a0compares the importance of business objectives made by finance leaders when they initiated their SSO engagements with how those same objectives have changed today. \u00a0Let’s summarize the significant points:<\/p>\nFinance leaders really want to increase their access to capability and solutions from 3rd party service providers. \u00a0<\/strong>Finance leaders have viewed this criteria as increasing by 46% in importance<\/em> since they embarked on their SSO. \u00a0This clearly implies they have seen what providers can\/are bringing to the table\u00a0up-close\u00a0and have realized these attributes are what they need to reach new levels of success. \u00a0This is a significant cultural\u00a0shift\u00a0from years-gone-by, when they over-relied on inhouse \u00a0staff development and heavy ERP\u00a0investments\u00a0to improve finance with limited help from the outside. Most finance organizations today are tired of constantly fighting ERP dysfunction and\u00a0poor process quality and are more focused on third parties to bring new ideas\/best-practices\/technologies to the table. \u00a0Moreover, as we have been seeing\u00a0repeatedly\u00a0at HfS, clients are increasingly recognizing the cultures and internal capabilities\u00a0of their service providers and want to nurture these skills and learning environments<\/em> into their own finance organizations.<\/p>\nImproving talent and flexibility to scale the finance organization is paramount. \u00a0<\/strong>While leveraging provider capability is the most significantly growing objective, improving finance talent and scaling finance are close behind. We see the desire from function heads to globalize processes and have their internal managers get a better handle on scaling finance to service the needs of the business, as critical goals of finance leaders today. \u00a0Clearly service providers, in addition to management consultants, are in increasing demand to help their clients develop smarter global delivery models that encompass their available talent across shared services, outsourcing and inhouse teams. \u00a0It’s no longer about clients managing each delivery model in silos – it’s about bringing them all together as one cohesive framework.<\/p>\nStandardizing process is desirable, but not a lot of companies are really doing it.<\/strong> \u00a0This objective only grew by 20%, which will disappoint some providers which are banking on pushing their clients into more radical overhauls of some of their internal processes to adopt their own workflows and best\u00a0practices. \u00a0In many ways, this really is telling us finance leaders are more focused on augmenting what they have, than completely overhauling processes with better ones. \u00a0Everyone says they want access to best-in-class processes, they say they want to blow up non-core \/ not critical processes and have them standardized and made more efficient – so why, pay tell, do they not do it. \u00a0We use the payroll example a lot, the most commonly outsourced finance\/HR process, whereby many CFOs \/ CHROs long gave up the ghost that there was any real strategic advantage keeping payroll inhouse, but even that case, barely a third of mid-large organizations<\/em> have actually outsourced it?<\/p>\nThe Bottom-line: \u00a0Service providers are in pole position to provide the value clients need, however, there needs to be some give-and-take on both sides to move beyond mere “augmentation”<\/span><\/p>\nThe augmenting versus instituting<\/em> argument really sums up where we all are as an industry at present; providers want to institute offerings that they can scale (standardize) and execute well, whereas buyers want the execution without the\u00a0standardization. \u00a0They want providers to bring them all the goodies at competitive prices to make them look really good, but are yet to really<\/em> embrace the internal change they have to go through in order to get the outcomes that they want.<\/p>\nThe key is for the chickens and the eggs is to figure out together which ones came first. \u00a0OK – that makes no sense! \u00a0The key is for the buyers and providers to figure out the right ways to engage, so that both are incentivized to invest in the relationship and the outcomes together<\/em>. \u00a0There has to be a bit of give-and-take – i.e. buyers need to understand that providers want scale and utility and would like to leverage their capabilities with other clients and not just them. \u00a0Similarly, providers need to\u00a0understand\u00a0that buyers’ needs are often complex and it’s not always “clear cut outsourcing”. \u00a0As our research will reveal shortly, far more buyers rely\u00a0predominantly\u00a0on shared services delivery models, and outsourcing engagements still tend to be treated as discreet, augmented support services. \u00a0In these cases, providers need to (at least at first) accept they need to work within the confines of their clients’ global delivery models that many not always suit them.<\/p>\nBoth sides need to look at the bigger picture to work out how to really find future value from each other. \u00a0Providers need to stop managing each client like a P&L and clients need to be prepared to understand what will encourage providers to share more of their delights.<\/p>\n
Stay tuned for Part II where we’ll take a deeper dive into the potential for Global Business Services across finance operations<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"While the world still known as “outsourcing” was quaking in fear at being renamed “augmentation”\u00a0(hehe), we received some interesting notes…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,50,80,838,86,91,832,830,837],"tags":[109],"organization":[],"ppma_author":[19],"class_list":["post-1385","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business-process-outsourcing-bpo","category-captives-and-shared-services-strategies","category-hr-strategy","category-kpo-analytics","category-outsourcing-advisors","category-saas","category-sourcing-best-practises","category-sourcing-change","category-the-industry-speaks","tag-acca"],"yoast_head":"\n
April truths about outsourcing: Finance leaders are looking to providers' capabilities more than ever, but are they really prepared to change? - Horses for Sources | No Boundaries<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n