{"id":1202,"date":"2013-11-07T20:45:00","date_gmt":"2013-11-07T20:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/projects\/horsesforsources\/invest-in-the-humans-first_110713\/"},"modified":"2013-11-07T20:45:00","modified_gmt":"2013-11-07T20:45:00","slug":"invest-in-the-humans-first_110713","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/invest-in-the-humans-first_110713\/","title":{"rendered":"Invest in the humans first, systems second"},"content":{"rendered":"
And now for the third and final installment in Christa Degnan\u00a0Manning\u2019s discussion on HR\u2019s obsession with obsolete processes<\/a>…<\/em><\/p>\n People leadership problems like \u201cSmarter management talent,\u201d and \u201cBetter talent in the HR function,\u201d are in the top 3 challenges to employee engagement uncovered in our survey while \u201cBetter technology implementations\/user experience\u201d ranked #11 and \u201cImproved data capability\/analytics to support my job\u201d ranked #12. Unfortunately there has been too much focus on HR process and automation in companies, with the latest hype around integration and analytics as the next breakthrough \u201cgotta have\u201d investments.<\/p>\n However, people lead people<\/em> and they are asking for the support, training, and enablement to meet and collaborate to both better manage day-to-day work and develop into the next generation of leaders. In another recent study HfS conducted on global business services functions, we explicitly asked about investments in formal business training in many key areas today by type of worker: enterprise or service provider.<\/p>\n What we found confirmed results found throughout the engagement research that workers are not getting development support: the majority are not getting any kind of formal training in critical business areas at all. As the extended enterprise expands, ambitious professionals may very well choose to work at service provider companies specifically because the traditional enterprise has dropped the ball in terms of its people. Will this be the tail wagging the dog?<\/p>\n Click to Enlarge<\/p>\n<\/div>\n When we asked workers in the engagement survey how they want to spend their time, regardless of engagement level, they did not call for more automation or integration. They said they want to improve existing business processes, innovate for customers, and collaborate with colleagues.<\/p>\n Click to Enlarge<\/p>\n<\/div>\n While a whole blog could be written on the trade offs of working from home and commuting (and likely will be at some point!), it is clear workers do not want to spend time on conference calls, administrative tasks, email, and compliance related activities. So companies should be relentless about giving them their time back.<\/p>\n There are actually great technologies out there to help manage hourly workers time \u2013 why not treat every worker as having a finite number of hours and assign them to company goals by skill set, availability, and interest? And we are not just talking hourly billable consultants here.<\/p>\n Measure managers on making sure that workers don\u2019t just do what makes the manager look good, but focus them on the right priorities and give them the assignments that help with their career progression whether that will be<\/em> inside or outside the company<\/em> (btw stay tuned for the full write up on the HR Technology conference where some innovative companies are headed in this direction.) One has to wonder if the cut-backs in training have come out of the need for cost savings, the lack of actual career progression opportunities inside firms, or a perverse fear that new skills sets will make workers more marketable elsewhere. Guess what? They are all foolish gambles.<\/p>\n Also, simply give people money to get together. While some individuals reported they wanted to travel less to be more engaged, a greater number <\/em>said they wanted to spend more time traveling (32%) and to attend industry conferences and events (49%), which are huge professional development and relationship building opportunities<\/em>. And fully half the survey respondents said they want to spend more time in team building activities, in mentor relationships, and in actual formal on the job training. Simply put, workers are starved for meaningful interaction.<\/em><\/p>\n Having been involved in econometric research analysis in the travel industry, I can tell you that the dramatic cutbacks of travel and entertainment budgets in 2009 and 2010 actually exacerbated the recession<\/em> as people stopped going out and connecting with customers and converting prospects, as well as having internal meetings and holding in-person training. Harvard and MIT have also done a compelling study that shows that the longer teams go without in-person meetings, the more trust is eroded and productivity suffers (For copies of either of these studies, just ask.)<\/p>\n So ironically despite the wide-spread adoption of the term \u201chuman capital,\u201d companies lost sight of the fact that economists use the term human capital not just as what people are inherently worth, but also how investments in people like education and training increase their value. <\/em>The modern organization has stopped making too many of these investments it seems in favor of automation at a time when companies need to rethink the very people processes they seek to automate.<\/p>\n The Bottom-line: It\u2019s all about people being empowered by technology across the extended enterprise<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/em><\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n