<\/a><\/p>\nReetika Joshi is HfS Research Director, BPO and Analytics Strategies (click for bio)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
From a service area perspective, analytics data preparation and management and routine reporting remain critical services today. However, we see a growing number of engagements that include advanced analytics, predictive modeling, ongoing analytics support, and analytics consulting.<\/p>\n
Industry verticals that have had greater data availability have naturally adopted analytics faster, across multiple business areas. These include banking and financial services, insurance, retail and consumer goods. As a result, analytics engagement maturity with service providers is also higher for companies in these verticals. They\u2019ve developed confidence in their partnerships and are on the lookout for more complex analytics opportunities\u2026 leveraging emerging technologies (e.g. social media monitoring) or applicability in core areas (e.g. underwriting analytics). Companies in verticals that have comparatively recently had data availability (such as healthcare) are looking to providers to show them cross-industry learnings and opportunities for analytics interventions.<\/p>\n
How\u00a0did we assess analytics innovation and execution performance for providers? \u00a0What did we look for?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\nTalking to buyers, they are most concerned about the quality of analytics talent working for them, industry expertise (particularly during strategy sessions and solution design), and flexibility in their analytics engagements. With this background, we applied our Blueprint methodology to evaluate innovation and execution for providers. With execution, we looked for solid delivery capabilities across the analytics value chain, analytics-specific geographical footprint and scale, experience delivering industry or horizontal-specific analytics solutions, flexibility to meet different client needs and the quality of customer relationships. For innovation, we looked for the completeness of vision of the end to end process lifecycle (from analytics road mapping to implementation and decision making), completeness of vision of industry-specific solutions (including talent and technology investments) and the ability to leverage external value drivers, including the other \u2018SMAC\u2019 components social, mobility and cloud.<\/p>\n
I wanted to stress that the analytics services market is still nascent with many of the service provider models still emerging.\u00a0 As this is our first Blueprint in this space, we wanted to highlight the market leaders that have developed full service<\/span> analytics capabilities, demonstrating scale and service depth across the analytics value chain. We evaluate services up and down the analytics value chain, including certain processes that aren\u2019t \u2018analytics\u2019 per se, but are essential for analytics success, such as analytics data preparation and management. \u00a0Our analysis reveals no true market \u2018laggards\u2019 for analytics, as we see expertise for one or more service categories from many providers.<\/p>\nWe saw some surprises with the Winners Circle and High Performers – can you talk a bit about which providers have excelled versus those which could perform better further down the road?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\nGenpact, Infosys and Wipro are in the Winner\u2019s Circle as they have significant scale in analytics, have demonstrated execution capability across service areas, and have very responsive account management teams. They have made great strides in vertical specializations and industry-unique analytics offerings and bring emerging technologies to clients. Along with these strengths, IBM and Accenture also have extensive experience in consulting, and have applied their expertise to help clients chart their analytics and data road maps and strategy. This makes their end-to-end vision for analytics compelling (I don\u2019t even need to mention IBM\u2019s $16B+ analytics acquisitions!) TCS and Capgemini have built strong offerings to help companies manage their requirements for ongoing reporting and insights. TCS especially excelled in the BFS analytics area. Cognizant, WNS, and EXL bring domain-specific innovations, having built strong industry-specific analytics capabilities especially in the high-end analytics modeling service area. I expect them to perform better in the next couple years as they are aggressively expanding these capabilities.<\/p>\n
Overall, what would your recommendations be to both buyers and providers looking at enterprise analytics services in today’s environment?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\nTalent will ultimately be the key to differentiation.<\/strong> The most satisfied buyers in our research spoke to the high quality of analytics talent they accessed through their providers. Buyers must look beyond fancy toolkits to the actual resources allotted to deriving insights from them. Onshore support, business context, and prior industry experience will make all the difference between good and great analytics providers in the near future.<\/li>\nLeveraging emerging technologies will pay off. <\/strong>Buyers are looking externally for expertise in new technologies for analytics. Providers that invest in integrating services with new technologies will earn thought leadership. Opportunities include modern data mining, data visualization, industry-unique predictive modeling tools, mobile dashboarding, and strategies for leveraging big data.<\/li>\nLeading with business perspective will drive value chain adoption. <\/strong>The bulk of work outsourced in this space continues to be in the realm of data preparedness and routine reporting. For advanced analytics and decision support to proliferate, the conversations must shift from the CIO\u2019s office to business leaders, from costs to business outcomes. Winning providers will encourage brainstorming sessions and regular senior leadership and SME interactions with clients to drive high value creation. The majority of buyers still seek help with more foundational areas, but the scope for high-value analytics will continue to expand as operating models mature.<\/li>\nService providers must bring cross-industry lessons to succeed. <\/strong>Buyers look for analytics expertise from providers that have prior experience and increasingly industry vertical experience. Providers are accordingly developing CoEs and aligning solution sets by verticals. Our conversations with buyers reveal that they are now also looking to providers to bring best-of-breed innovations from across industries that may have shared applicability. We see functional areas as equally important service areas for analytics, and foresee innovative analytics implementations through cross-industrial partnerships.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\u00a0The 2013 Blueprint Report for Enterprise Analytics Services can be accessed by HfS premium subscribers by clicking here<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"And finally one of the most complex Blueprints is finally final, where we researched across the services lines to ascertain…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,65,78,81,838,92,831,832,97],"tags":[172],"organization":[],"ppma_author":[19],"class_list":["post-1199","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business-process-outsourcing-bpo","category-hfs-blueprint-results","category-hfsresearch-com-homepage","category-it-outsourcing-it-services","category-kpo-analytics","category-security-and-risk","category-smac-and-big-data","category-sourcing-best-practises","category-talent-in-sourcing","tag-big-data"],"yoast_head":"\n
The 2013 Enterprise Analytics Services Blueprint is announced: Accenture, Genpact, IBM, Infosys and Wipro make the Winners Circle - Horses for Sources | No Boundaries<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n