{"id":1094,"date":"2014-10-31T10:40:00","date_gmt":"2014-10-31T10:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/projects\/horsesforsources\/providers-labor-arbitrage_103114\/"},"modified":"2023-11-12T18:15:08","modified_gmt":"2023-11-12T18:15:08","slug":"providers-labor-arbitrage_103114","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/providers-labor-arbitrage_103114\/","title":{"rendered":"Why some service providers are grimly clinging onto the labor-arbitrage model"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
As I was finalizing client interviews for our forthcoming Blueprint on “Progressive F&A Services”, my overwhelming conclusion is how unprogressive<\/em> many of today’s BPO relationships still are.<\/strong><\/p>\n To epitomize our findings, to quote one major enterprise client, “We worked really hard to move onto a transactional pricing model with our service provider – and they worked with us to achieve that outcome. \u00a0However, once the service provider started taking a drop in revenues from us, they insisted on moving back to the FTE-based setup.”<\/p>\n Now re-read that quote one more time – what does that tell<\/em> you? \u00a0Yes, people, some of today’s service providers depend<\/em> on the legacy effort-based labor model to keep their revenue numbers up. \u00a0Having their clients shift to more fluid volume-based models is costing them money, and they don’t like it. What’s more disturbing here, is the fact that the profitability generated by the service\u00a0provider is through the margins on selling the labor<\/em>, not the margins on selling the services<\/em>. \u00a0Changing the legacy model does not sit well with some service\u00a0providers, as pricing by FTE guarantees them a predictable rate of return, whereas innovating with the way services are priced and the risks\/gains are shared<\/em>\u00a0isn’t doing them any favors.<\/p>\n At least that service\u00a0provider had\u00a0tried<\/em> to move its client away from a labor-arbitrage-driven model – many other BPO clients are simply locked down in a perpetual status quo, where delivery is transactional, and they are struggling to get them to change how they operate.<\/p>\n What’s most worrying for the BPO industry is the simple fact that half<\/em> of today’s BPO relationships are still operating in legacy labor-arbitrage models, and only 28% have introduced technology-enablement into their business service delivery, according to our survey earlier this year on the state of BPO and technology-enablement:<\/p>\n